既然月球上沒有風，也沒有大氣層，美國國旗怎么會在首次登月的照片中飄揚呢?
Since there is no wind or atmosphere on the Moon, how can the US flag be flapping in pictures of the first Moon landing?
譯文簡介
網(wǎng)友：在尼爾·阿姆斯特朗登月的視頻片段中，你可能會看到美國國旗似乎在飄動。這在月球上是怎么發(fā)生的呢？你是否真的觀看過這些視頻，還是僅僅重復了你在某個陰謀論網(wǎng)站上看到的內容？實際上，如果你仔細觀察視頻，就會發(fā)現(xiàn)國旗之所以會動，是因為宇航員在插旗時的振動和搖晃造成的。
正文翻譯
Since there is no wind or atmosphere on the Moon, how can the US flag be flapping in pictures of the first Moon landing?
既然月球上沒有風，也沒有大氣層，美國國旗怎么會在首次登月的照片中飄揚呢?
評論翻譯
很贊 ( 0 )
收藏
In some videos of Neil Armstrong landing on Moon, I have seen flag of U.S.A waving. How's that possible on moon?
Have you actually watched those videos, or are you just regurgitating something you read on a conspiracy web site? Because it's pretty obvious if you actually watch the video that the reason it's waving is because the astronaut is shaking the darn thing.
在尼爾·阿姆斯特朗登月的視頻片段中，你可能會看到美國國旗似乎在飄動。這在月球上是怎么發(fā)生的呢？你是否真的觀看過這些視頻，還是僅僅重復了你在某個陰謀論網(wǎng)站上看到的內容？實際上，如果你仔細觀察視頻，就會發(fā)現(xiàn)國旗之所以會動，是因為宇航員在插旗時的振動和搖晃造成的。
The flag was supported by a stiff wire and shuving into the ground the pole also put some vibration in the wire which obviously caused the flag to wave. This question has come up many times by folks who are convinced about conspiracy by NASA. In fact, its very hard for the goverment to hide things for long due to profit or political motive to expose. Like, The H bomb, or Nixon's tapes and of course the young lady hidding under Clinton's desk.
美國國旗之所以看起來在飄動，是因為它下面有一根硬鋼絲支撐，而且當旗桿被插入月球表面時，鋼絲產(chǎn)生了一些振動，這自然會讓國旗呈現(xiàn)出飄動的樣子。這個疑問經(jīng)常被那些相信NASA有陰謀論的人提出。事實上，由于利益或政治動機，政府想要長期隱瞞事情是非常困難的。想想看，無論是氫彈的秘密，尼克松的錄音帶，還是與克林頓辦公桌下的那位年輕女士有關的傳言，最終都被曝光了。
I've been hearing this one since 1970 when I was 25 and it will linger long after I'm gone. Gullibility knows no limits.
自從1970年我25歲時，我就不斷聽到這種陰謀論，而且即使我離世后，這樣的說法可能還會繼續(xù)流傳。這表明，人們容易受騙的程度是無限的。
A moon landing video footage I saw showed the American flag waving.
How is that possible considering that the moon lacks atmosphere and therefore any kind of wind-flow is impossible?
Torque, you dorque! The astronauts had to jimmy it into place. Also, the moon does experience the occasional moonquake, some of which could have been artificial in nature, caused by the Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package (ALSEP) seismographic experiment, in which a mortar system launched explosive packets some distance away and seismographs measured the resulting shock wave to determine the composition of the moon.
我在觀看的月球著陸視頻中，美國國旗似乎在飄揚。然而，由于月球上沒有大氣，是不可能存在風的，這究竟是怎么回事呢？其實，這是因為宇航員在將國旗插入月球表面時，需要用力使其保持展開狀態(tài)。此外，月球確實會偶爾發(fā)生月震，其中一些可能是人為因素造成的。這主要是由阿波羅月球表面實驗包（ALSEP）的地震學實驗引起的。在這項實驗中，一個迫擊炮系統(tǒng)會向遠處發(fā)射爆炸包，地震儀會測量由此產(chǎn)生的沖擊波，從而分析月球的內部結構。
If there is no atmosphere on the moon, then how is the American flag flying when they planted it during the moon landing in 1969?
When the flag was planted, the flag was moving because of conservation of momentum and the stiffness of the cloth. That started it flapping. Without air, there was no air resistance to slow it down - so it flapped much faster and much longer than you’d expect it to from such a gentle initial force.
月球上沒有大氣，1969年登月時插上的美國國旗看起來怎么會飄動呢？
插旗時，國旗之所以會動，是因為布料的硬度和動量守恒定律導致的。這種動作讓國旗開始擺動。月球上沒有空氣，因此也就沒有空氣阻力來減慢它的擺動速度，所以國旗擺動得比我們預期的要快，持續(xù)時間也更長，盡管最初的力量非常輕微。
So the ONLY thing that could slow the flapping down was the internal friction between the strands of cloth inside the flag and the energy dissipated by bending those fibres.
That meant that the flag flapped for quite a while before eventually coming to a stop.
由于月球的重力較小，對布料的拉力也較小，而且旗桿設計有一個水平的支撐部件來托起國旗（因為月球上沒有風）。
因此，唯一能減緩國旗擺動的就是布料內部纖維之間的摩擦力，以及纖維彎曲時消耗的能量。
這意味著國旗需要一段時間才會停止擺動。
Some interesting facts about those flags:
With the amount of solar radiation and intense UV light - the flags have long ago been bleached completely white.
這導致許多缺乏批判性思維能力和對物理學知之甚少的人，錯誤地將這種擺動視為登月造假的“證據(jù)”。然而，這種不尋常的擺動實際上恰恰證明了登月是真實的！
國旗的安置其實是在最后關頭才決定的。NASA一度無法確定，插上美國國旗是否會被解讀為一種挑釁行為，好像在宣稱月球是美國的領土。因此，當最終決定要插旗時，他們匆忙派遣了一名初級職員去附近的商店購買國旗。這些國旗并不是為這次任務特別制作的……而且旗桿的設計——特別是它帶有的可折疊水平支撐部分——是在準備登月過程中最后確定的設計細節(jié)。
A moon landing video footage I saw showed the American flag waving. How is that possible considering that the moon lacks atmosphere and therefore any kind of wind-flow is impossible?
This question has been asked and answered ad nauseam.
There was no wind moving the flag.
The flag was moving because of the momentum imparted to it as the astronauts themselves were moving it about as they were planting it.
The flag stopped moving almost immediately after the Astronauts stopped messing with it.
我在觀看的月球著陸視頻中，美國國旗似乎在飄動?？紤]到月球沒有大氣層，因此任何形式的風都不可能存在，這怎么可能呢?
這個問題已經(jīng)被多次提出并解答。
實際上，并沒有風在吹動國旗。
國旗之所以會動，是因為宇航員在插旗時給它施加了動力。在宇航員停止擺弄國旗后，旗子幾乎立刻停止了移動。
In point of fact, it actually continued to move for a slight bit longer after the astronauts stopped messing with it, than had there been an atmosphere. As there was no air to act as a dampening force to the flag’s movement. No air resistance.
Had there been an atmosphere, but still— calm air… the flag would have stopped moving even sooner.
由于沒有空氣或微風使它移動，它停止后沒有更多的運動。
事實上，由于月球上缺乏空氣來對國旗的擺動產(chǎn)生阻力，國旗在宇航員停止操作之后，相較于地球上有大氣的環(huán)境，還多持續(xù)了一會兒的擺動。
如果有大氣存在，哪怕是在風平浪靜的情況下，國旗的擺動會更快地停止。
The flag behaved EXACTLY AS IT SHOULD in the vacuum of space.
Try again Flat Earth Idiots.
如果有空氣和微風，國旗會持續(xù)飄揚。
在太空的真空環(huán)境中，國旗的表現(xiàn)完全符合物理規(guī)律。
對于那些堅持錯誤觀念的人，請再次審視事實。
A moon landing video footage I saw showed the American flag waving. How is that possible considering that the moon lacks atmosphere and therefore any kind of wind-flow is impossible?
This was explained on TV in the live broadcast at that time of the first landing, before the flag was brought out. The flag not only had a rod at the top to spread it out, but either the rod was springy, or there was an added spring, I forget which, to help create the waving effect. This was quite deliberate. It was just a little bit of whimsy and patriotic pride , and fun, from the engineers. I think it was to go along with the part in the national anthem that says “Oh say does that star spangled banner yet wave, o’er the land of the free and the home of the brave.”
我看到的一段登月錄像顯示，美國國旗在飄揚。考慮到月球沒有大氣層，因此任何形式的風都不可能存在，這怎么可能呢?
在首次登月任務的現(xiàn)場直播中，宇航員展示國旗之前，解說已經(jīng)向觀眾解釋了國旗的設計。國旗頂部裝有一根橫桿來撐開它，而且這根桿子具有彈性，或者是另外加裝了一個彈簧（具體細節(jié)我記不清了），這樣做的目的是為了模擬出一種飄揚的效果。這種設計是經(jīng)過深思熟慮的，它體現(xiàn)了工程師們的一點幽默感、愛國心以及創(chuàng)意樂趣。我認為這樣的設計是為了呼應美國國歌中的那句歌詞：“哦，你看星條牌不是還高高飄揚,在這自由的國土,勇士的家鄉(xiāng)”
正是這些事實讓我確信登月是真實的。當你關注整個過程，閱讀新聞報道，觀看電視轉播時，你會發(fā)現(xiàn)那并不是虛構的劇本，而是真實的、有些混亂的生活寫照。盡管那時候我們的科幻小說里已經(jīng)有了許多更先進的設想，但能在現(xiàn)實生活中實現(xiàn)這樣的壯舉，無疑是一次美妙的體驗，它讓全世界都為之振奮，共同見證了這一刻。
A moon landing video footage I saw showed the American flag waving. How is that possible considering that the moon lacks atmosphere and therefore any kind of wind-flow is impossible?
I always find this particular question amusing. I’ve heard so many people use it as a “Gotcha! Explain that, Mr. Apollo Was Real!” What’s so amusing is that the moving flag is one of the better pieces of evidence that the video footage from the Moon’s surface is real.
Surely the conspiracy brigade can do better than this tired and endlessly explained “non-obxtion.”
我看到的一段登月視頻顯示美國國旗在飄動。考慮到月球上沒有大氣層，因此不可能有任何風流動，這怎么可能呢？
我總覺得這個問題很有趣。我聽過很多人把它當作一種“明白了吧！解釋一下吧，阿波羅登月是真的！”的質問。好笑的是，國旗的飄動反而是證明視頻確實來自月球表面的一項更有力的證據(jù)。
陰謀論者們應該能夠提出一些比這種已經(jīng)被反復澄清和駁斥的“無稽之談”更加有力的論據(jù)。
Why is the American flag shown waving on the moon when there is no wind and did NASA ever answer this question?
It's not waving. It's held up by a crossbar across the top of the flag, and wrinkles in the material make it look like it's waving.
The only time it actually flapped was when it was buffeted by the backwash of the lunar lander's rocket engine as it took off. This actually knocked the flag over, as we saw via the automatic TV camera left behind.
為什么美國國旗在沒有風的時候在月球上飄揚，美國宇航局回答過這個問題嗎?
美國國旗并沒有真的飄動，而是通過旗頂部的一根橫桿固定。布料上的皺褶給人一種飄動的視覺效果。
實際上，國旗真正出現(xiàn)擺動的情況僅有一次，那就是在登月艙起飛時，由于火箭引擎的尾流沖擊所導致。這股力道實際上把國旗給吹倒了，這一過程被我們留在月球上的自動電視攝像機捕捉到了。
OMG, the US flags were deployed on a spring loaded bar that snapped into place and the release of spring energy created the flapping. There's no atmosphere on the moon, duh, so it's obvious the flapping was caused by the deployment mechanism. It ain't rocket science.
"哇，美國國旗是通過一個彈簧裝置展開的，當彈簧彈開時釋放的能量讓國旗產(chǎn)生了擺動。月球上沒有大氣，這是常識，所以很明顯，這種擺動是由旗幟的展開機制造成的，這并不復雜。
How does the the flag move on the moon if there is no wind?
It doesn't. The movement you see in the videos of the landing is due to the chain weighting down the bottom swaying from the movement of placing the flag. With no atmosphere it would wave for a while, but eventually whatever the fabric equivalent of rolling friction is, will slow it down.
如果月球上沒有風，國旗怎么會動呢？
它不會動。你在登陸視頻中看到的移動是因為固定在底部的鏈條在放置國旗時的擺動。由于沒有大氣層，它會擺動一會兒，但最終，不管是什么類似于滾動摩擦的織物因素，都會讓它慢下來。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://equalizerredsea.com 轉載請注明出處
That flag looks as if it has a straight rod inserted across the top of it to hold it out straight. The bottom looks as if it is floating (like astronauts hair in the ISS) not being blown about by a breeze.
那面國旗看起來好像在頂部插入了一根直桿，使它保持展開狀態(tài)。底部看起來像是在漂?。ň拖駠H空間站中宇航員的頭發(fā)一樣），并沒有被微風吹動。
Is there wind on the moon? If not, how come in the footage of Neil Armstrong on the moon, the US flag is waving?
There isn’t any wind on the moon. Well, technically the Moon has an extremely thin “atmosphere,” but by Earth standards, it’s a hard vacuum. The film of the flag “waving,” as you put it, has nothing to do with there being any wind. The flag was secured by two sides to a metal frx. When dude planted it, it started vibrating and the flag being attached to it, the flag also moved. Because there was no air to create any drag on the flag and slow down the waving motion, it just sorta kept on waving.
月亮上有風嗎？如果沒有，那么在尼爾·阿姆斯特朗在月球上的錄像中，美國國旗怎么會飄動呢？
月球上沒有風。嚴格意義來說，月球的“大氣層”非常稀薄，但按照地球的標準，它是一個高真空。你所提到的國旗“飄動”現(xiàn)象，其實和風沒有任何關系。國旗是固定在一個金屬框架上的。當宇航員將其植入月球表面時，框架產(chǎn)生了振動，連帶國旗也動了。由于月球上沒有空氣，也就不存在空氣阻力來減緩國旗的擺動，因此國旗持續(xù)地保持著擺動的狀態(tài)。
A moon landing video footage I saw showed the American flag waving. How is that possible considering that the moon lacks atmosphere and therefore any kind of wind-flow is impossible?
Actually, you have drunk the koolaid because you think there is no air on the moon. Of course there is air. It is a secret that NASA and the Illuminati have tried to hide so they can keep their cities and bases there a secret. After all, if the general public knew there was air on the moon, everyone would want to go there, and then the 33rd Degree Masons would have to find another place to hide.
我看到的一段登月錄像顯示，美國國旗在飄揚。月球沒有大氣層，按理說不可能有風，但這是怎么回事呢？
事實上，你可能已經(jīng)被誤導了，因為你認為月球上沒有空氣。但事實上，月球上確實存在空氣，只是NASA和光明會一直在保密，目的是為了隱藏他們在月球上的秘密城市和基地。如果大眾知道月球上真的有空氣，那么每個人都會渴望去那里探險，這樣一來，33級共濟會成員就不得不重新找個隱蔽的地方了。
But, try as they might, that pesky lunar atmosphere made the flag move, so we know that it is all a hoax to fool us.
阿波羅登月任務的所謂目的，實際上是為了前往月球表面一個精心搭建的場景，那里被設計成看似沒有空氣，以便他們可以假裝必須穿戴那些龐大而笨重的宇航服來呼吸。為了增加可信度，他們特意選擇了一個沒有任何植被的月球荒漠地帶。
盡管他們費盡心機，但月球上那微弱的大氣作用卻使得國旗產(chǎn)生了擺動，這個現(xiàn)象讓我們意識到所謂的登月不過是一個用來迷惑我們的大騙局。
There is of course no atmosphere on the Moon so the flag isn’t “flapping”. What the flag is doing is waving. Waves still propagate in materials whether they are in an atmosphere or not. This is demonstrated numerous times and is why the flag required a rod at its top to make it stand out.
月球上自然沒有大氣層，所以國旗并沒有像在風中那樣“擺動”。實際上，國旗是在‘擺動’。波動現(xiàn)象即使在沒有大氣的環(huán)境中也能在物質中傳播。這一點已經(jīng)通過多次演示得到證實，也正是國旗頂部需要一根橫桿來支撐，使其更加顯眼的原因。
現(xiàn)在你提到的所謂登月造假的‘證據(jù)’已經(jīng)被澄清，也許你應該去探究那些關于所謂騙局的其他荒誕不經(jīng)的說法（提前告訴你：它們都是無稽之談），然后回歸理性，認識到登月確實是真實的，是人類歷史上最偉大的成就之一……除非你已經(jīng)被那些心懷惡意的網(wǎng)絡噴子徹底洗腦了。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://equalizerredsea.com 轉載請注明出處
The US flag on the Moon during the first Moon landing appeared to be flapping because of the way it was designed. The flag had a horizontal rod along the top edge that allowed it to extend outwards, and it was also made of a lightweight material that could easily move in the absence of wind or atmosphere. When the astronauts were planting the flag, they rotated it back and forth to get it into the ground, which caused the flag to move and appear as though it was waving.
首次登月時，月球上的美國國旗之所以看起來像在飄動，是因為它獨特的設計。國旗頂部裝有一根橫桿，讓它能夠展開，同時國旗采用輕盈材質，在無風無大氣的環(huán)境中也能輕易擺動。宇航員在將國旗植入月球表面時，為了穩(wěn)固它，會來回旋轉國旗，這樣的動作讓國旗產(chǎn)生了擺動，給人一種它在風中飄揚的視覺效果。