美國宇航局什么時候再次登月?
When will NASA go to the moon again?
譯文簡介
網(wǎng)友：美國國家航空航天局(NASA) 很快會再次登月嗎？他們計劃在2024年再次登上月球。考慮到太空項目的復(fù)雜性，通常會預(yù)期一些延遲。但特朗普顯然希望能見證某些重要的“太空事件”（當(dāng)他得知即使連任，NASA也無法在他的任期內(nèi)到達(dá)火星時，他感到非常失望）。如果他連任，或許至少能在2024年與首位登上月球的女性對話……
正文翻譯
When will NASA go to the moon again?
美國宇航局什么時候再次登月?
評論翻譯
很贊 ( 8 )
收藏
Will NASA be on the moon again soon?
They actually plan to go in 2024. The way things work in the space business, one would normally expect delays.
But Trump apparently wants to oversee some important “space event” (he was saddened to hear that there was no way NASA could get to Mars during his presidency, even assuming his reelection). If he is reelected, he may at least get to talk to the first woman on the moon in 2024.
Incidentally, being President during the 1969 landings didn’t ultimately do that much for Nixon’s legacy.
美國國家航空航天局(NASA) 很快會再次登月嗎？
他們計劃在2024年再次登上月球?？紤]到太空項目的復(fù)雜性，通常會預(yù)期一些延遲。
但特朗普顯然希望能見證某些重要的“太空事件”（當(dāng)他得知即使連任，NASA也無法在他的任期內(nèi)到達(dá)火星時，他感到非常失望）。如果他連任，或許至少能在2024年與首位登上月球的女性對話。
順便提一句，1969年登月時擔(dān)任總統(tǒng)對尼克松的政治遺產(chǎn)并沒有帶來多大的影響。
Watergate was 17 June 1972. It took a while to hit the media. Last Apollo was 19 December 1972. Trump would want to do a lot more than just talk to the first woman to go to the moon
水門事件發(fā)生在1972年6月17日，但花了一段時間才被媒體曝光。最后一次阿波羅任務(wù)是在1972年12月19日。特朗普可能不只是想和第一位登上月球的女性對話。
Yeah cos nixon wound down the project
是的，因為尼克松縮減了這個項目。
Was Nixon the one that was at the centre of the Watergate scandal? I'm assuming that was mild sarcasm when you said didn't do much for his legacy, & I know it happened around 40-50 years ago (Watergate, not the moon landings, I know that was 1969-1972)
尼克松是水門事件的主角嗎？你說水門事件對他的遺產(chǎn)影響不大時，是不是在開玩笑？我知道水門事件大概發(fā)生在40到50年前（我知道登月是在1969年至1972年之間）。
I saw the moon in Perth today but it disappeared
我今天在珀斯看到月亮，但它消失了。
When will NASA return humans to the Moon?
NASA is in the business of space exploration. NASA has already explored the Moon. Turns out, it was fairly dull.
When there might be something new to explore on the Moon, NASA will go back. But the Moon hasn’t changed much in 4 billion years, so I wouldn’t hold my breath.
NASA 何時會讓人類重返月球？
NASA 的任務(wù)是進(jìn)行太空探索，而月球已經(jīng)被他們探索過了。結(jié)果發(fā)現(xiàn)，月球相對來說相當(dāng)乏味。
只有當(dāng)月球上有新的東西值得探索時，NASA 才會重返月球。但月球在過去的40億年里幾乎沒有什么變化，所以我不會對此抱太大期望。
Can NASA go to the moon again?
Could we? Of course. There are two small non-governmental companies in the U.S. that are on the verge of being able to go there as well. They at least have a strong incentive: space tourism. But as far as NASA is concerned, you’d have to come up with a darn good reason for them to go back again, since the space race was long ago won.
NASA 能再次登上月球嗎？
我們能去嗎？當(dāng)然可以。美國有兩家小型非政府公司也幾乎具備了前往月球的能力。至少它們有一個強(qiáng)大的動機(jī)：太空旅游。不過，至于 NASA，你需要給他們一個非常充分的理由讓他們重返月球，因為太空競賽早已結(jié)束。
Can NASA still go to the moon?
Right now, the vehicles to take us there are being developed… the *knowledge* exists - but, at the moment, the *hardware* doesn’t…. but, hopefully soon - it’ll be ready.
NASA 還能登上月球嗎？
目前，載我們?nèi)ピ虑虻娘w行器正在開發(fā)中……我們已經(jīng)掌握了知識，但現(xiàn)在還缺乏硬件……不過，希望不久后就能準(zhǔn)備就緒。
Will NASA return to the moon?
I think so. President George W. Bush had instructed NASA to return to the moon as its next mission after the Space Shuttle program. President Obama, although accused by right-wing pundits of shutting down NASA, instead redirected NASA to land astronauts on an asteroid and on Mars.
”NASA is developing the capabilities needed to send humans to an asteroid by 2025 and Mars in the 2030s – goals outlined in the bipartisan NASA Authorization Act of 2010 and in the U.S. National Space Policy, also issued in 2010.”
NASA 會重返月球嗎？
我認(rèn)為會的。喬治·W·布什總統(tǒng)曾指示 NASA 在航天飛機(jī)計劃結(jié)束后將重返月球作為下一項任務(wù)。盡管右翼評論員指責(zé)奧巴馬總統(tǒng)關(guān)閉了 NASA，但實(shí)際上他重新將 NASA 的目標(biāo)轉(zhuǎn)向了將宇航員送上小行星和火星。
“NASA 正在開發(fā)將人類送往小行星（目標(biāo)2025年）和火星（目標(biāo)2030年代）所需的能力——這些目標(biāo)在2010年通過的《兩黨 NASA 授權(quán)法案》和2010年發(fā)布的《美國國家太空政策》中有所規(guī)定。”
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://equalizerredsea.com 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處
It’s not clear that NASA has any reason to go to the moon now. We know where the moon is, we have samples of its rocks, why would a publicly funded space agency keep sending missions there? It’s far more likely that Elon Musk will send some teslas there and set up a low-gravity driving school…. or more likely… start a mining operation to bring in some income offsetting the costs and effort of flying there.
目前看來，NASA 似乎沒有足夠的理由再次前往月球。我們已經(jīng)知道月球的位置，也采集了它的巖石樣本，為什么一個由公共資金支持的太空機(jī)構(gòu)還要繼續(xù)向那里派遣任務(wù)呢？更有可能的是，埃隆·馬斯克會把一些特斯拉汽車送上月球，并在那里開設(shè)一個低重力駕駛學(xué)?！蛘吒赡艿氖?，他會啟動一項采礦作業(yè)，以產(chǎn)生收入，抵消飛往月球的成本和投入。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://equalizerredsea.com 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處
Is NASA going back to the Moon?
Yes but only after they've been shamed by another country beating them back there
NASA 會重返月球嗎？
會的，但可能要等到其他國家先登月之后，他們才會行動。
Emeritus Professor of Astronomy, Author (ErindalePublishing)
I believe current plans are still for 2024. But funding is iffy, and all sorts of intermediate steps could involve failures of one sort or another, so I wouldn’t count on it.
榮譽(yù)天文學(xué)教授，作家（Erindale Publishing）
我相信現(xiàn)在的計劃仍然是2024年重返月球。但資金不確定，過程中的各種中間步驟可能會出現(xiàn)失敗，所以我不太相信會如期實(shí)現(xiàn)。
How long before NASA goes to the Moon again?
How long before NASA goes to the Moon again?
At this point, there is no telling. While they’ve been directed by the current administration in the White House to go back and land astronauts on the Moon by 2024, NASA has not received the commensurate increase in budget necessary to even attempt pulling something this ambitious off.
If I were to guess? No sooner than 2030. I suspect that the Chinese or some other country will accomplish this before NASA does. It may even be a private corporation that pulls it off sooner.
NASA 還要多久才能再次登上月球？
目前還無法確定。雖然現(xiàn)任政府已經(jīng)指示 NASA 在2024年前重返月球并讓宇航員登陸，但 NASA 并沒有得到足夠的預(yù)算來完成這個雄心勃勃的計劃。
如果要我猜的話，可能不會早于2030年。我懷疑中國或其他國家會在 NASA 之前實(shí)現(xiàn)這一目標(biāo)，甚至可能是一家私人公司更早完成這個任務(wù)。
Will NASA be on the moon again soon?
Well, this is more of a political question than a scientific one. It totally depends on the current U.S. president and the next one.
If the question is can NASA go to the moon soon. Then the answer is definitely yes.
However this question cannot really be answered without full understanding of the political situation
NASA 很快會再次登上月球嗎？
這其實(shí)更多是一個政治問題，而非科學(xué)問題。這完全取決于現(xiàn)任和下一任美國總統(tǒng)的決策。
如果問的是 NASA 能否很快重返月球，那么答案肯定是可以的。但要真正回答這個問題，需要充分了解當(dāng)前的政治局勢。
I agree. Just wanted to see if someone comes up with a different angle. Thanks.
我贊同這個觀點(diǎn)，只是想看看有沒有人能從不同的角度提出看法，謝謝。
Answer: NASA cannot go to the moon or any other celestial body with human beings. NASA does not have the funding and hasn’t had the funding since their last Apollo mission. Go and research NASA funding over the years. Go and research how much of NASA money is spent by percentage to just take car...
回答：NASA 無法讓人類登上月球或其他天體。自從最后一次阿波羅任務(wù)以來，NASA 一直沒有足夠的資金。你可以查一下 NASA 多年來的預(yù)算情況，看看他們在各個項目上的資金分配。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://equalizerredsea.com 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處
When are we going back to the moon?
Humans are going back to the Moon for sure but there is no correct answer to when.
NASA is planning to land on Moon again with a public-private partnership. But I don't think it will be so soon as they have many other projects like Mars landing ahead of all.
Indian space agency ISRO is also working hard to reach Moon. They are going to launch an unmanned mission in few years which is going to be very important for future manned missions.
So at this point of time, no one can say that when we are going to Moon but it's certain that we will.
我們什么時候會重返月球？
人類肯定會重返月球，但具體時間尚無定論。
NASA 計劃通過公私合作的方式再次登陸月球。但我認(rèn)為這不會很快實(shí)現(xiàn)，因為他們還有其他優(yōu)先任務(wù)，比如火星登陸。
印度空間研究組織（ISRO）也在努力實(shí)現(xiàn)登月目標(biāo)，他們將在未來幾年發(fā)射一項無人任務(wù)，這對于未來的載人任務(wù)至關(guān)重要。
因此，目前沒人能準(zhǔn)確說出我們何時會重返月球，但可以肯定的是，我們一定會回去的。
Will NASA return to the moon?
This cannot be ruled out, but circumstances during the 1960’s, the decade during which the commitment to land men on the moon was made, and then carried out, were very different from today. In 1946, the US national debt was 120% of GDP, but 1947–47 were years during which the federal budget was in surplus, and there were four surpluses during the 1950’s. In those days, the highest marginal tax rate was 91%, the government was adequately funded, and the national income was shared much more evenly and fairly than today. By 1960, the surpluses and economic growth had reduced the debt to 54% of GDP.
NASA 會重返月球嗎？
這種情況不容忽視，但1960年代——即承諾并實(shí)施登月計劃的十年——與現(xiàn)今的環(huán)境截然不同。1946年，美國的國家債務(wù)占GDP的120%，但在1947至1948年間，聯(lián)邦預(yù)算實(shí)現(xiàn)了盈余，且整個1950年代共有四年出現(xiàn)財政盈余。那時，最高的邊際稅率達(dá)到91%，政府資金充裕，國民收入的分配遠(yuǎn)比今天更加均衡和公正。到了1960年，得益于財政盈余和經(jīng)濟(jì)增長，債務(wù)比例已降至GDP的54%。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://equalizerredsea.com 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處
肯尼迪總統(tǒng)就職時，失業(yè)率達(dá)到了戰(zhàn)后的最高水平。為了激活經(jīng)濟(jì)，他推行了全面的減稅措施，把最高邊際稅率降至75%。這一政策使得稅收收入和預(yù)算支出基本平衡，只產(chǎn)生了微小的赤字。這樣的刺激措施促進(jìn)了經(jīng)濟(jì)增長。由于經(jīng)濟(jì)增長速度遠(yuǎn)遠(yuǎn)超過國家債務(wù)的增長（以美元計的債務(wù)總額繼續(xù)上升），債務(wù)在國內(nèi)生產(chǎn)總值(GDP)中的占比持續(xù)下降，稅收收入的增長速度超過了償還債務(wù)成本的增長。正是這一財政狀況使得美國有能力承擔(dān)阿波羅計劃所需的開支。
Today, the USA has seen forty years of mostly decline, where, except for 1993–2001, disastrous policies centred on tax cuts the country couldn’t afford, have shifted the distribution of the national income in favor of the rich, leaving steadily declining living standards for most other people. The national debt is now 128% of GDP and continuing to rise, and the trade deficit is $964 Billion. The cost of servicing the debt is currently $394 Billion, more than 10% of budget outlays.
此外，1970年的截止日期意味著整個研發(fā)計劃將在兩屆總統(tǒng)任期內(nèi)執(zhí)行，這降低了因資金大幅削減決策而導(dǎo)致項目停滯的風(fēng)險。
如今，美國經(jīng)歷了四十年的大體下滑期。除了1993年到2001年之外，災(zāi)難性的政策——主要是國家無法承擔(dān)的減稅措施——已經(jīng)改變了國民收入的分配，使之更有利于富人，而大多數(shù)其他人的生活水平卻在穩(wěn)步下降。目前，國家債務(wù)已達(dá)到GDP的128%并且還在持續(xù)增長，貿(mào)易赤字高達(dá)9640億美元。目前償還債務(wù)的成本為3940億美元，超過預(yù)算支出的10%。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://equalizerredsea.com 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處
只要國家債務(wù)和累積的貿(mào)易赤字的增速持續(xù)超過經(jīng)濟(jì)增速，每年由經(jīng)濟(jì)增長帶來的財富中，越來越多的部分將不得不用于償還這些債務(wù)。這將導(dǎo)致作為國民收入的部分不斷減少，并在美國人之間極不平等地分配，富人依然占據(jù)著過大的份額。
Undoing the damage would take decades and require a long term commitment to sensible policies by both parties, which only the Democrats are currently committed to.
除非美國經(jīng)濟(jì)能夠重返上世紀(jì)60年代的基本面，否則美國宇航局（NASA）獲得持續(xù)的資金支持來實(shí)施再次登月的計劃將非常困難。要扭轉(zhuǎn)目前的局勢需要數(shù)十年的時間，并且這需要兩黨都持續(xù)承諾實(shí)施明智的政策，而目前只有民主黨展現(xiàn)出了這樣的承諾。
Will NASA be on the moon again soon?
Science may well try to present us yet another hoax, but this time every pre-school child will be able to tell it’s a lie, since nowadays even young children understand much about computer technology, so they can tell the difference between what is real and what is computerized. And that especially since children are not yet “hypnotized” the way most adults are, so the children can see what adults can’t, because the former’s minds are not “blocked up” like the minds of the latter.
NASA會很快再次實(shí)現(xiàn)登月嗎？
科學(xué)界可能會再次向我們呈現(xiàn)一個騙局，但這一次，即便是學(xué)齡前兒童也能夠識破，因為在當(dāng)今時代，連小孩子都對計算機(jī)技術(shù)有著不少了解，他們能夠區(qū)分真實(shí)與計算機(jī)生成圖像的差異。特別是孩子們尚未像大多數(shù)成年人那樣受到“洗腦”，因此他們能夠看到成年人看不見的東西，因為孩子們的思維沒有像成年人那樣被封閉。
如果給孩子們看一段國際空間站（ISS）的視頻，視頻中地球的旋轉(zhuǎn)方向是西向東，那么任何一個聰明的孩子都會用他們的理解力讓你驚訝，他們會向你解釋為什么這段視頻是計算機(jī)生成的圖像。因此，當(dāng)觀看NASA的“太空船”接近并登陸月球的場景時，每個聰明的孩子都能夠辨別出這是真實(shí)的事件還是好萊塢制作的電影。
但你知道嗎，喜歡這樣童話故事的人應(yīng)該盡情享受它們。正是因為這些人，NASA一直在向我們提供如此多的太空圖片。
No! there is nothing to go there for ! You have to realise that ‘The Moon Race’ was really ‘The Arms Race’ in disquise ! The rockets that launched Apollo were actually designed to launch Nuclear Bombs to the USSR ,just as the Russian rockets were made to launch bombs to the USA ! Also robotic probes are MUCH cheaper than manned ones and can do more !
不！我們沒有必要去那里！你需要明白，“月球競賽”實(shí)際上就是一場偽裝的“軍備競賽”！發(fā)射阿波羅航天器的火箭實(shí)際上是為向蘇聯(lián)投送核彈而設(shè)計的，正如俄羅斯的火箭也是為了向美國投送炸彈而制造的！而且，機(jī)器人探測器的成本遠(yuǎn)低于載人航天器，而且能夠執(zhí)行更多任務(wù)！
First of all they did actually go to the Moon. There are mountains and mountains of proof to verify that. Secondly why on Earth do you equate not going back with the possibility that they never went there to begin with? That makes absolutely no sense. Let's say you visited some other country for vacation. If you don't go back time and time again to that same country is that evidence that you never went to begin with?
首先，他們確實(shí)登陸過月球，這一點(diǎn)有無數(shù)證據(jù)支持。其次，你為何將不重返月球與他們從未登陸過月球混為一談？這種說法根本站不住腳。打個比方，如果你曾經(jīng)去另一個國家度假，難道因為你沒有一再去那個國家，就能證明你從未去過那里嗎？
人們未能再次登月的原因只有一個，那就是缺乏資金和政治決心。維持NASA的阿波羅計劃和航天飛機(jī)計劃需要巨額資金和巨大努力，他們無法做到兩者兼顧。最終，他們選擇了發(fā)展航天飛機(jī)項目?，F(xiàn)在，他們正在建造太空發(fā)射系統(tǒng)，這個系統(tǒng)將使人類有能力重返月球。
If NASA really went to the moon, how come they have not gone back there?
Simple. Ignore the mad ramblings of conspiracy theorists. It just comes down to MONEY.
The US had won the race to the moon. There was little more to gain from more moon-shots, so why spend large sums of money going back there? Politicians have better things to do with such huge sums. I’m sure lining their pockets isn’t one of them.
如果NASA真的登陸過月球，為何他們至今未再回去？
原因很簡單：不要理會那些陰謀論者的胡言亂語，關(guān)鍵問題在于資金。
美國已經(jīng)贏得了登月競賽。重復(fù)登月無法獲得更多收益，何必再投入巨額資金去那方面呢？政治家們有更多重要的事情需要用到這樣龐大的資金。我相信他們不會用這些錢來中飽私囊的。
I would like to explain as i had done extensive research on Nasa and other space agencies around the world i felt speechless with the way scientists in the name of science are fooling people across world i will explain in detail to make it clear first starting with moon mission they claim to have gone there but they never did there is a place in us called area 51, sector zone 27 and sector zone 22 thease are the places where with the help of highly advanced simulated technology is used to conduct all the missions moon mission was conducted here on 20july 1969 later on it was said that aliens missions was also conducted by taking African old retired men mars mission is again being carried out in sect 2
經(jīng)過我對NASA以及全球其他太空機(jī)構(gòu)的深入研究，我對科學(xué)家們以科學(xué)之名愚弄全世界的方式感到震驚。我將詳細(xì)解釋，以澄清事實(shí)，首先從登月任務(wù)開始。他們聲稱已經(jīng)登陸過月球，但實(shí)際上并沒有。在美國，有一個被稱為51區(qū)的神秘地方，其中包括27區(qū)和22區(qū)。這些區(qū)域利用高度先進(jìn)的模擬技術(shù)來執(zhí)行所有太空任務(wù)。據(jù)稱，1969年7月20日的登月任務(wù)就是在這里進(jìn)行的。之后，還有說法稱，利用非洲年長的退休人員進(jìn)行了外星人相關(guān)的任務(wù)?；鹦侨蝿?wù)據(jù)說目前正在2區(qū)進(jìn)行。